new resize prototype, boundToPage, indices, onMouseDown/onMouseUp/onFocus/onBlur

src/graphics/components/Component.h

@@ -12,6 +12,9 @@ struct rgba {
     unsigned int a;
 };
 
+// should have 2 classes after this
+// non-rendererable component (wtf are these?)
+// and renderable component
 class Component {
 public:
     virtual ~Component();
@@ -30,8 +33,12 @@ public:
     // since we update the window size before resize, why just not pass it
     // well no need to pass it if it's just a window* and then we'd already have it
     // but we may hang onto the variables to know what the state is set up for
-    virtual void resize();
+    // why pass it here? on resize we call layout no this...
+    virtual void resize(const int passedWindowWidth, const int passedWindowHeight);
 
+    void pointToViewport(float &rawX, float &rawY) const ;
+    void distanceToViewport(float &rawX, float &rawY) const ;
+    
     // HELP I'M LOOKING FOR YOUR OPINION
     // a ptr to window would be less memory
     // but it would increase Component's depenedencies
@@ -46,7 +53,11 @@ public:
      */
     int windowWidth;
     int windowHeight;
-    
+    bool boundToPage = true;
+    const unsigned int indices[6] = {
+        0, 1, 2,
+        0, 2, 3
+    };
     bool verticesDirty = false;
     std::shared_ptr<Component> parent = nullptr;
     std::shared_ptr<Component> previous = nullptr;
@@ -93,7 +104,12 @@ public:
     bool isVisibile = true;
     bool isInline = false; // text-only thing but there maybe other non-text inline
     bool textureSetup = false;
+    // probably shoudl be vector (or maybe use the event emitter)
+    std::function<void(int x, int y)> onMousedown = nullptr;
+    std::function<void(int x, int y)> onMouseup = nullptr;
     std::function<void()> onClick = nullptr;
+    std::function<void()> onFocus = nullptr;
+    std::function<void()> onBlur = nullptr;
 };
 
 #endif