Perhaps make the .bots command respond with who owns the bot in addition to the existing language they are written in
For clarity’s sake: are you proposing that such information becomes mandatory?
The IBIP standard already leaves room for such information to be left as an optional trailing argument.
No i am not suggesting it become mandatory, but it would clear up who owns what bot (unless it is obvious like lykbot or yossarian-bot). This would clear up confusion if someone has 2 bots
Maybe add to the definition another optional field for owner, to persuade users on adding it.
Kinda like: Reporting in! [<language>] [<owner>] information
Reporting in! [<language>] [<owner>] information
correct, that is what i am suggesting, not mandatory, but it would clear up people who have 2+ bots
No due date set.
This issue currently doesn't have any dependencies.
Deleting a branch is permanent. It CANNOT be undone. Continue?